Pages

Tuesday, 14 October 2014

[RwandaLibre] * Misleading, inaccurate and empty petition from Kagame’s consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide:

 

This is a petition that jeopardises the intellectual integrity of these so-called scholars. It is about protecting their consultancy jobs and money offered to them by Kagame despite some of them being paid by the institutions they are working for . Others are  freelancers who need  money to live on. Others are paying back for the past money  that they received from  Kagame. It is a shame on these scholars to  sign a such empty  petition.


From: "Samuel Desire sam4des@yahoo.com [Democracy_Human_Rights]" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>
To: "Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>; "africarealities@yahoogroups.com" <africarealities@yahoogroups.com>; "rwandalibre@yahoogroups.com" <rwandalibre@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 14 October 2014, 20:33
Subject: Re: *DHR* Misleading and inaccurate petition from Kagame's consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide:

 
The war criminal and dictator Kagame has used his consultants to  deny his war crimes and crimes against humanity. The consultants have found themselves in an embarrassing situation when they were asked by Kagame to sign the petition below( prepared by Kagame). These  Kagame's consultants and workers could not refuse to sign the petition due to the consultancy jobs and bribes they were offered in the past and other consultancy opportunities they are expecting in the future.
 
It is also well known that  that BBC journalists who were reporting Kagame's war under his protection were frequently shown  the dead corpses of Hutus killed by the RPF as Tutsi corpses killed by the Interahamwe. These  tactics are well-known in guerrilla wars. This is why  the number of killed Tutsi still don't add up and the  higher and magic  figures of massacred Tutsi have become a mystery.
 
 


From: "Afrika Watch afrikawatch@yahoo.com [Democracy_Human_Rights]" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>
To: Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr
Sent: Tuesday, 14 October 2014, 11:47
Subject: *DHR* Misleading petition from Kagame's consultants, research, journalists, workers and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide:

 
Misleading petition from Kagame's consultants, research, journalists, workers  and supporters criticises the BBC programme abut Rwandan genocide
 
Kagame is well known to be using bribes to attract support from  white people from USA and Britain.
 
A group of international consultants who have been working for Kagame for the last 20 years have now criticised the BBC programme in relation to Rwandan genocide.  The letter was prepared by Kagame and circulated  by the Rwandan Embassy in the UK for signature  by these consultants.
 
Among  people who have signed the petition below include representatives of NGOs who have using genocide cards to get British money to fund their NGOs. Andrew Walllis was  paid £150,000 by Kagame to  create his Open Democracy  website and write the book "Silent Accomplice: The untold Story of the Role of France in the Rwandan Genocide, I.B.Tauris, 2014". Even Romeo Dallaire who failed to prevent the genocide because of his lack of neutrality during the conflict in his role as representative of UN mission to Rwanda has signed the petition. Romeo Dallaire supported Kagame's war in order to remove the former regime of Habyarimana.
 
It is even strange to see that the content of the letter  is referring to  the investigations by Judge Marc Trévidic  to support the consultants' arguments while  the dictator and war criminal Kagame, Andrew Wallis and Linda Melvern have been documenting and accusing France of their involvement in the Rwandan genocide. It is well known that any different view to Kagame's version of the history of  Rwandan genocide is considered by  the war criminal and dictator Kagame as  genocide revisionism. BBC was right to ignore these investigations because they are not credible and have not yet provided any answer to who shot the plane that was carrying two Presidents and their crew and entourage. The French approach to this matter has been repentance rather than finding the truth. In addition to this, the  preliminary outcome of  French investigations do not conclude that the plane was not shot by Kagame. So, it was not necessary for BBC to refer to them while investigations have not yet been completed.
 
The content of the consultants' letter written to BBC is not credible because these consultants  have been  working for Kagame for many years, paid  to write books about  him and his war, to represent him abroad and in various international conferences, They received financial support from Kagame  to attend various conferences related to genocide.  These consultants have not provided contradictory  facts about the fake numbers of Tutsi killed as the result of the genocide. They have never condemned the massacres, war crimes and crimes against humanity  committed by Kagame in Rwanda and in DR Congo.
 
In this petition, no credible answer was provided by the consultants about the issues raised by BBC.
 
Will  we have people to defend  and support  Kagame's version of the history of Rwandan genocide even after his death. Let's wait and see !
 
"Rwanda's Untold Story," BBC Documentary Offers Compelling Case Of Kagame As War Criminal - See more at: http://www.blackstarnews.com/us-politics/justice/rwandas-untold-story-bbc-documentary-offers-compelling-case-of-kagame-as-war#sthash.RShmsXd3.dpuf
BBC Asks 'What Really Happened in Rwanda? History of the Genocide. Role of the US
 
 
Relate story
 
FULL LETTER AND LIST OF THE PETITIONERS
Mr. Tony Hall, Director-General of the BBC, Broadcasting House, Portland Place,
London, W1A 1AA
October 12, 2014
Dear Sir,
We the undersigned, scholars, scientists, researchers, journalists and historians are writing to you today to express our grave concern at the content of the documentary Rwanda's Untold Story (This World, BBC 2, Wednesday, October 1), specifically its coverage of the 1994 genocide of the Tutsi.
We accept and support that it is legitimate to investigate, with due diligence and respect for factual evidence, any crimes committed by the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), and to reflect on the contemporary political situation in Rwanda. However, attempts to examine these issues should not distort the reality of the 1994 genocide. It is not legitimate to use current events to either negate or to diminish the genocide. Nor is it legitimate to promote genocide denial.
The parts of the film which concern the 1994 genocide, far from providing viewers with an 'Untold Story' as the title promises, are old claims. For years similar material using similar language has been distributed far and wide as part of an on-going 'Hutu Power' campaign of genocide denial. At the heart of this campaign are convicted génocidaires, some of their defence lawyers from the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), and their supporters and collaborators. These deniers continually question the status of the genocide and try to prove – like the programme – that what it calls the 'official narrative' of the 1994 genocide is wrong. The BBC programme Rwanda's Untold Story recycles their arguments and provides them with another platform to create doubt and confusion about what really happened.
Three of the untenable claims made in the programme are of the utmost concern: the first is a lie about the true nature of the Hutu Power militia. The second is an attempt to minimize the number of Tutsi murdered in the genocide, and the third is an effort to place the blame for shooting down President Habyarimana's plane on April 6, 1994 on the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF).
First, the programme allows a witness to claim that 'only ten percent of the Interahamwe (militia) were killers'. In fact, the majority of Hutu Power militia forces – estimated to have been 30,000 strong – were trained specifically to kill Tutsi at speed, and indoctrinated in a racist ideology, part of genocide planning. There is eyewitness testimony by several militia leaders who cooperated with the ICTR.
Second, the programme attempts to minimise the number of Tutsi murdered, a typical tactic of genocide deniers. The false figures cited are provided by two US academics who worked for a team of lawyers defending the génocidaires at the ICTR. They even claim that in 1994 more Hutu than Tutsi were murdered – an absurd suggestion and contrary to all the widely available research reported by Amnesty International, UNICEF, the UN Human Rights Commission, Oxfam, Human Rights Watch, Africa Rights, a UN Security Council mandated Commission of Experts and evidence submitted to the ICTR and other European courts who have successfully put on trial several perpetrators.
Third, the film argues that the shooting down of the plane on April 6, 1994 was perpetrated by the RPF. This same story was promoted by Hutu Power extremists within a few hours of the president's assassination and promoted ever since by génocidaires and a few ICTR defence lawyers.
The film pays no heed to a detailed expert report published in January 2012 by a French magistrate Judge Marc Trévidic. This contains evidence from French experts, including crash investigators, who proved scientifically that the missiles that shot down the plane came from the confines of the government-run barracks in Kanombe on the airport's perimeter – one of the most fortified places in the country, and where it would have been impossible for the RPF, armed with a missile, to penetrate.
Within hours of the president's assassination, in this carefully planned genocide, roadblocks went up all over Kigali and the Presidential Guard started to target every member of Rwanda's political opposition.
These momentous events are barely mentioned. The members of the Hutu and Tutsi pro-democracy movements were hunted down and killed, including Rwanda's Prime Minister, Agathe Uwilingiyimana, and ten UN peacekeepers from Belgium who were protecting her. These opposition politicians separately threatened the Habyarimana regime for advocating power-sharing and paid for their courage with their lives. Ignored in this film are the Hutu Power attempts to divide the internal political opposition along ethnic lines. Political violence in the film is seen only in the context of a 'civil war' between the RPF and the Habyarimana government, a smoke screen, used then and now, to hide the systematic killing of Tutsi carried out by the Hutu Power Interim Government and its militia.
The film-maker, Jane Corbin, who presented the programme, even tries to raise doubts about whether or not the RPF stopped the genocide. The authority on this subject is Lt.-General Roméo Dallaire, the Force commander of the UN Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR), and present in Rwanda throughout the genocide. Dallaire is categorical. 'The genocide was stopped because the RPF won and stopped it', he says. Corbin ignores the testimonies of direct witnesses to what happened in 1994: Dallaire and his volunteer UN peacekeepers, Philippe Gaillard and the medics at the International Committee of the Red Cross, and Dr. James Orbinski of Médecins Sans Frontières. Years of research and writing by academics and other experts along with hours of films by journalists who work for the BBC – all of this eyewitness testimony is dismissed as if fraudulent.
In broadcasting this documentary the BBC has been recklessly irresponsible. The programme has fuelled genocide denial. It has further emboldened the génocidaires, all their supporters and those who collaborate with them. It has provided them the legitimacy of the BBC. Denial of genocide causes the gravest offence to survivors. For them, the genocide is not a distant event from 20 years ago but a reality with which they live every day.
The denial of genocide is now widely recognised as the final stage of the crime. One of the world's preeminent genocide scholars, the US Professor Greg H. Stanton, describes ten stages in genocide: classification of the population; symbolization of those classifications; discrimination against a targeted group; dehumanisation of the pariah group; organisation of the killers; polarisation of the population; preparation by the killers; persecution of the victims; extermination of the victims; and denial that the killing was genocide.
Denial, the final stage, ensures the crime continues. It incites new killing. It denies the dignity of the deceased and mocks those who survived. Denial of genocide is taken so seriously that in some European countries it is criminalized. In 2008 the Council of the European Union called upon states to criminalize genocide denial.
The 1994 genocide of the Tutsi should be treated by all concerned with the utmost intellectual honesty and rigour. We would be willing – indeed see it as our duty – to meet with journalists and to debate in a follow up programme the serious inaccuracies in Rwanda's Untold Story.
We hope that the BBC management will quickly realise the gravity of the genocide denial in Rwanda's Untold Story. We call upon the BBC to explain how the programme came to be made and the editorial decision-making which allowed it to be broadcast. In the course of any internal BBC enquiry we hope all relevant documents from the This World archive and from senior editors involved in approving the programme will be released for study.
Rwanda's Untold Story tarnishes the BBC's well-deserved reputation for objective and balanced journalism. We urge the BBC to apologise for the offence this programme has caused for all victims and survivors of the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.
--------------------
Signed
Professor Linda Melvern, Author, A People Betrayed: The Role of the West in Rwanda's Genocide; Conspiracy to Murder

Senator Roméo Dallaire, Force Commander, UNAMIR

Professor Gregory H. Stanton, President, Genocide Watch

Mehdi Ba, Journalist and Author

Bishop Ken Barham, Dr. Margaret Brearley Independent Scholar

Dr. Gerald Caplan, Author, The Preventable Genocide

Professor Frank Chalk, Professor of History/Director, Montreal Institute for Genocide and Human Rights Studies, Concordia University, Co-author, 'Mobilizing the Will to Intervene: Leadership to Prevent Mass Atrocities' (McGill-Queen's University Press, 2010)

Dr.Phil Clark, Reader in Comparative and International Politics, SOAS, University of London

Boubacar Boris Diop, Sénégal. Author, Murambi, the book of bones

Jean-François Dupaquier, Author and Expert

Hélène Dumas, Diplômée de l'IEP d'Aix-en-Provence (2003), Docteur en histoire de l'EHESS (2013)

Professor Margee Ensign, President, American University of Nigeria

Tim Gallimore, Independent genocide researcher

Peter Greaves, Former UNICEF staff member

Fred Grünfeld, Emeritus professor in International Relations, Human Rights and the Causes of Gross Human Rights Violations, Universities of Maastricht and Utrecht, Netherlands. Author, The Failure to Prevent Genocide in Rwanda: The Role of Bystanders, 2007

Dr. Helen Hintjens, Assistant Professor in Development and Social Justice, International Institute of Social Studies (ISS) The Hague

Dr. Georgina Holmes, Lecturer International Relations,
University of Portsmouth/Royal Holloway, University of London

Richard Johnson, Author, The Travesty of Human Rights Watch on Rwanda

Eric Joyce MP, Ambassador Karel Kovanda (ret), Czech Representative on the UN Security Council, 1994-95

Françoise Lemagnen, Chief Executive, Survivors Fund (SURF)

Ambassador Stephen Lewis, Former Canadian Ambassador to the UN.

W. Alan McClue, Visiting Fellow, Bournemouth University/Cranfield University

Roland Moerland, Ph.D. Researcher and Lecturer in Supranational and Organizational Criminology, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology Maastricht University, The Netherlands

George Monbiot, Author and Journalist

Jacques Morel, Author, La France au coeur du génocide des Tutsi (2010)

Barbara Mulvaney, International Law Consultant; Former Senior Trial Attorney - Bagosora et al., United Nations International Tribunal for Rwanda

Dr. Jude Murison, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh

Peter Raymont, President, White Pine Pictures, Toronto, Canada

Professor Josias Semujanga, Professeur titulaire, Département des littératures de langue française, Université de Montréal, Quebec

Jonathan Salt, Managing Director of Ojemba Education

Keith Somerville, Senior Research fellow, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London; Lecturer in Communications and Humanitarianism, Centre for Journalism, University of Kent

Patrick de Saint-Exupéry, Author and journalist

Dr James M. Smith, CBE CEO, Aegis Trust

Rafiki Ubaldo, Journalist

Andrew Wallis, Author, Silent Accomplice: The untold Story of the Role of France in the Rwandan Genocide, I.B.Tauris, 2014

Lillian Wong, O.B.E., British Chargé d'Affaires in Rwanda 1994-1995
 
Source:
******
 
 




__._,_.___

Posted by: Samuel Desire <sam4des@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (3)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________

More news:  http://www.amakurunamateka.com ; http://www.ikangurambaga.com ; http://rwandalibre.blogspot.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-SVP, considérer  environnement   avant toute  impression de  cet e-mail ou les pièces jointes.
======
-Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

[RwandaLibre] Kagame accuses BBC of genocide denial.

 

http://news.yahoo.com/rwandan-president-accuses-bbc-genocide-denial-184059595.html


Ces gens qui envoient des pétitions chez BBC sans parler du génocide des Hutus, alors que c'était le sujet du film, eh bien ces soit-disant intellectuels se discréditent. Ils oublient aussi que BBC est un colossal dans le milieu des médias.


--
SIBOMANA Jean Bosco
Google+: https://plus.google.com/110493390983174363421/posts
YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9B4024D0AE764F3D
                                http://www.youtube.com/user/sibomanaxyz999
***Online Time:15H30-20H30, heure de Montréal.***Fuseau horaire domestique: heure normale de la côte Est des Etats-Unis et Canada (GMT-05:00)***

__._,_.___

Posted by: Jean Bosco Sibomana <sibomanaxyz999@gmail.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________

More news:  http://www.amakurunamateka.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-SVP, considérer  environnement   avant toute  impression de  cet e-mail ou les pièces jointes.
======
-Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

[RwandaLibre] Fw: *DHR* controverse avec la BBC

 

Cyakora biragara ko n'abo gusinya iriya baruwa babuze kuko ni bake cyane kandi n'abo bazwiho polarisation y'ibibazo by'u Rwanda. Buriya Kagame ntako atagize kugira ngo benshi basinye ariko bababuze. Biragaragara rero ko Kagame abyina avamo. Hasigaye igihe gito. 

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Leopold Munyakazi Cakazi2004@yahoo.com [Democracy_Human_Rights]" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>
To: "Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>
Sent: Tuesday, 14 October 2014, 21:05
Subject: Re: *DHR* controverse avec la BBC

 
C'est naturellement la même bande de menteurs assermentés qui ont signé la lettre. Que les menteurs soient cinq, dix, cent ou mille, ça n'empêche pas du tout que le mensonge reste toujours un mensonge. Il y aurait au moins mille fois plus de signataires d'une lettre de soutien et d'encouragement à la BBC. Les membres de cette bande de comploteurs, de propagandistes et d'agents du Diable n'ont pas honte de ressasser leurs vieilles fausses vérités que les acteurs ou témoins oculaires de la planification, provocation, exécution et dissimulation du génocide rwandais ont anéanties depuis belle lurette. La marche de l'Histoire et les progrès de la Recherche désintéressée les ont laissés trop loin derrière de façon qu'il n'y a plus de crédules qui réservent quelque attention à leurs balivernes.

Combat d'arriere-garde!


On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 12:46 PM, "Samuel Desire sam4des@yahoo.com [Democracy_Human_Rights]" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr> wrote:


 
Pierre,

Vous avez raison. Ces consultants de Kagame n'ont même pas présenté des arguments contradictoires sur ce qui est dit dans le documentaire surtout les chiffres magiques du nombre des Tutsi assassinés. Kagame  a préparé le document et ils les a demandé de signer. Ils ne pouvaient pas refusé considérant qu'ils attendent d'autres opportunités de consultation.
 
 
=-=-=-=

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "pierre foucher akagera@hotmail.fr [Democracy_Human_Rights]" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>
To: FOUCHER Pierre <democracy_human_rights@yahoogroupes.fr>
Sent: Tuesday, 14 October 2014, 17:11
Subject: RE: *DHR* controverse avec la BBC

 
Pour ce qui concerne les français , on remarque les activistes acharnés à salir la France: Saint Exupéry, Morel et Dumas pour les principaux ......
 
Il serait temps qu'ils réfléchissent un peu et analysent objectivement et intelligemment le documentaire de la BBC! On attend qu'ils présentent des arguments un peu plus développés et fondès que cette pétition pavlovienne
 

To: Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr
From: Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:29:14 +0200
Subject: *DHR* controverse avec la BBC

 




__._,_.___

Posted by: Samuel Desire <sam4des@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________

More news:  http://www.amakurunamateka.com ; http://www.ikangurambaga.com ; http://rwandalibre.blogspot.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-SVP, considérer  environnement   avant toute  impression de  cet e-mail ou les pièces jointes.
======
-Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

[RwandaLibre] Dr Theogene Rudasingwa's letter to BBC.

 

Dr Theogene Rudasingwa's letter to BBC.

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Jack Karangwa jack.karangwa@yahoo.com [Democracy_Human_Rights]" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>
To: "Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr" <Democracy_Human_Rights@yahoogroupes.fr>
Sent: Tuesday, 14 October 2014, 20:34
Subject: *DHR* Ibarwa Dr Theogene Rudasingwa yandikiye umukuru wa BBC amushimira, akamagana ba blancs menteurs

 
Mr. Tony Hall,
Director-General of the BBC,
Broadcasting House, Portland Place
London. W1A 1AA
 
October 14, 2014.
 
Dear Mr. Hall,
 
I am writing to express my deep gratitude to BBC for the courageous undertaking to produce and broadcast the documentary, Rwanda's Untold Story. As you have witnessed in the last few days since the broadcast, the documentary has provoked strong passions on either side of the Rwanda debate, thus confirming that BBC's endeavor has responded to an un-met need for dialogue and debate in contemporary Rwandan society. Despite relentless noise from President Paul Kagame's brutal dictatorship, both open and disguised, BBC should be proud that it has made a contribution to Rwanda's search for the whole truth upon which a safe and shared future for all Rwandans must be built.
Allow me to take liberty to use this thank you note to express utter dismay and grave concern about the content in a letter that a group of people calling themselves scholars, scientists, researchers, journalists and historians wrote to you on October 12, 2014. While I do not doubt their credentials, their attempt to silence the BBC and Rwandans, in defense of the Kigali regime, should be strongly condemned by all truth-loving peoples.
I cannot claim to be a distinguished scholar, scientist, researcher, journalist or historian. However, in my own country Rwanda, and about Rwandans, I do make a claim that I am a good student who has knowledge about our shared history, our present, and struggles for a secure future for all.
 I am a Tutsi. My father was killed during an earlier round of violence (the Hutu Revolution of 1959) when I was a baby. Three quarters of my life I have been a refugee, first from a "Hutu" regime, and now from a "Tutsi" one. During the civil war of 1990-1994, I was an emissary of the now ruling Rwandese Patriotic Front (RPF), knocking on the doors of uncaring and insensitive governments, and personalities, some of whom co-signed the shameful letter to you. I was RPF's Secretary General during the 1994 genocide, in which many of my relatives, and friends perished.  I have served Rwanda as its Ambassador to the United States, and as President Paul Kagame's Chief of Staff. I was a vigorous architect and defender of the realm as defined by the RPF in post-1994 Rwanda. In short, I know what I am talking about. I am not the kind of person to deny, minimize, or revise genocide.
Since 2010, I have served Rwandans as a leader of one of the opposition groups in exile, the Rwanda National Congress (RNC). It is in this latter capacity that I have crossed the dangerously cruel ethnic divide to appreciate the immense suffering and  fear that feed both the violence and dictatorship in Rwanda.
I am not therefore surprised that President Kagame's regime would react violently against BBC's Rwanda's Untold Story. The regime has methodically and persistently assassinated or jailed those who have sought to tell the truth. Deceptions and denials are the heart of undemocratic regimes, both ancient and modern. What I am yet to understand fully is what motivated the "scholars, scientists, researchers, journalists and historians" to become such forceful yet absurd apologetics of a regime that exhibits genocidal characteristics as the BBC documentary attempts to highlight. Is it ignorance? Surely not, for these are learned fellows. Is it money that the regime habitually dishes out to its apologetics? Probably not all of them, since some are honorable people. Is it ego that causes people to get mired deeper into falsehoods that have become part of a seductive industry rather than confront the truth? Only time will tell.
 
First, the "scholars, scientists, researchers, journalists and historians" say,
"We accept and support that it is legitimate to investigate, with due diligence and respect for factual evidence, any crimes committed by the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), and to reflect on the contemporary political situation in Rwanda"
This is precisely what the BBC story tries to tell. It tells the story of the shooting down of President Habyarimana's plane that triggered the genocide and massacres; the Robert Gersony report that was shelved in a conspiratorial manner; the Kibeho massacres; the horrendous human rights abuses in the Democratic Republic of Congo; the incarceration of political leaders who call for accountability; the assassination and assassination attempts on political opponents whom the regime believes have a credible story to tell; the protection of the Kagame regime from accountability by the U.K. and U.S. governments;  the marginalization or silencing of international prosecutors who would have investigated the regime's crimes; and, the scandalous towing of the Kigali regime's narrative that is all too obvious in the international system.
The authors of the letter should tell us if they, individually or collectively, ever investigated the crimes committed by the Kagame RPF regime. They conveniently picked what they could brandish against those who call for the whole truth, in an effort to intimidate them into silence. By calling them supporters and collaborators of convicted genocidaires, or apologetics of "Hutu Power", the authors of the letter are recycling an old intimidation method of the regime that has worked for the last twenty years but which inevitably draws close to expiry.
 
Second, on the question of numbers of Tutsi who were killed during the genocide I am not persuaded to agree with the figure of 200, 000 given by the American Professors.  At the same time, post-1994 history was written by the victorious Tutsi RPF, which had an obvious interest in giving its own version of the high number of victims, (800,000-1 million), which the guilty international community was compelled to accept as gospel truth. Notably, the authors do not even talk about Hutu who were killed before, during and after the genocide. Do the authors subscribe to the Kagame regime view that all Hutu are genocidaires collectively, for whom there should be no sympathy and no justice? The American Professors in the BBC story give a number of 800,000. This is not cast in stone, and is debatable like the number of Tutsi deaths. Nobody should minimize the Tutsi deaths or the Hutu deaths.
Rwandans will decisively and finally put these matters to rest as a society when we seek the truth freely, candidly, and without the obstruction by vested interests of a state held hostage by small cliques. The whole truth should enable all Rwandans to build an authentic and sustainable unity and reconciliation, not based on cyclical retribution, but all embracing justice. Otherwise, the competition as to who died more (Hutu or Tutsi) is a meaningless race to mutually assured destruction.
 
Third, on the question of the numbers of the Interahamwe militia who participated in the killings, I wonder how this can be relevant. For Rwandans who went through the horrors of 1994, both Hutu and Tutsi, the agonizing remembrance of the unimaginable violence unleashed by hordes of militia is substantive proof that this was lethal power. The BBC documentary, in its opening moments captures the agony of the victims, as they are hacked to death by this militia. So what if they were 5,000, 10, 1000, 30,000? For the American Professors, and the authors of the letter trading polemics on this matter, I would say this is not time well spent. The militia had to be defeated militarily. I am glad they did. Unfortunately, the military victors of 1994 went on a killing spree in Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo that is yet to be accounted for. That should be a subject of urgent interest rather than counting the number of militia that were involved in the genocidal madness.
 
Fourth, it is on the shooting down of the Habyarimana plane that the authors of the letter to you show their true bias in favor of the Kagame regime. Citing Judge Marc Trevidic, the authors pretend that the investigation has been concluded, and that it exonerated Paul Kagame from the responsibility for the epic act that triggered the genocide. That is a shameful lie. For us who know the facts about the matter, we have testified and others will testify in the investigation. Ultimately, nothing Kagame and his apologetics will say can erase the fact that Kagame ordered the shooting down of the plane in which two sitting African Heads of State and all their entourage died. His utter disregard for Tutsi and Hutu lives and his push for getting to power by any means possible should not minimize those who took advantage of the situation to commit the crime of genocide. The whole truth may finally be revealed in a post-Kagame era since he has invested substantial resources to obstruct accountability, and has mobilized powerful friends in the international system to protect him. Paul Kagame is a factor in the Tutsi genocide. He is the main culprit in the terrorist act in the shooting down of the plane.
 
Finally, the authors of the letter have betrayed their professions by insulting the BBC that  by "broadcasting this documentary the BBC has been recklessly irresponsible" and that "the programme has "fuelled genocide denial" "emboldened the génocidaires,  all their supporters and those who collaborate with them." This is a language that does not befit scholars, scientist, diplomats, journalist and historians. Such noble professions have throughout history risked on the side of freedom, justice, innovation, and the rule of law against what often was conventional wisdom. Many did perish rather than compromise with the deceptions of the status quo. The authors have chosen a safer route with a rotten and dying regime. They have deliberately decided to demonize Jane Corbin, John Conroy, and the BBC just as perpetrators of genocide do. Where is the patience and tolerance for different opinions?  Where is the intellectual rigor, honesty, and sense of duty on matters that touch the millions of Rwandans, both Hutu and Tutsi? It is, in fact, the authors of this letter that are encouraging the Kagame regime to run faster in its trajectory to human rights abuses, war, and possibility of genocide: its denials, targeting groups, dehumanizing groups of people, polarization of the population, organizing killers, and persecution of victims. In the past its victims were predominantly Hutu. Now, paradoxically, the regime has descended on those Tutsi it claims to have saved in 1994.
 
I conclusion, allow me to quote a famous American scholar, John Rawls, on the price and requirements of truth and justice:
 
Justice is the first virtue of social institutions, as truth is of systems of thought. A theory however elegant and economical must be rejected or revised if it is untrue; likewise laws and institutions no matter how efficient and well-arranged must be reformed or abolished if they are unjust. Each person possesses an inviolability founded on justice that even the welfare of society as a whole cannot override. For this reason justice denies that the loss of freedom for some is made right by a greater good shared by others. It does not allow that the sacrifices imposed on a few are outweighed by the larger sum of advantages enjoyed by many. Therefore in a just society the liberties of equal citizenship are taken as settled; the rights secured by justice are not subject to political bargaining or to the calculus of social interests."
BBC has done a great service to all Rwandans by provoking a debate that cannot take place within Rwanda's repressive state, and which Rwandans in diaspora can only participate in at the risk of death. The authors of the arrogant protest note to BBC have a luxury that most Rwandans are yet to gain as their right. Rwanda's Untold Story has once again proved that BBC's reputation as a credible partner in the search for truth and justice is an enduring one.
I challenge those making loud noise against BBC to an international debate on Rwanda. Invited to such an international conference will be BBC journalists, international experts on Rwanda,  the Government of Rwanda, its supporters and collaborators, as well as Rwandans of all walks of life. Perhaps, through that Rwandans and partners can begin to have a civil and constructive dialogue to own a difficult past and present, even as they shape a common future, one step at a time. Short of that, Rwanda now moves to a period of rapid escalation. And, judging from Rwanda's history, that is bad news.
 
Sincerely,
 
Dr. Theogene Rudasingwa
Washington D.C.
USA


Envoyé par : Jack Karangwa <jack.karangwa@yahoo.com>

__._,_.___

Posted by: Samuel Desire <sam4des@yahoo.com>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (1)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________

More news:  http://www.amakurunamateka.com ; http://www.ikangurambaga.com ; http://rwandalibre.blogspot.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-SVP, considérer  environnement   avant toute  impression de  cet e-mail ou les pièces jointes.
======
-Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

__,_._,___

“Uwigize agatebo ayora ivi”. Ubutegetsi bukugira agatebo ukariyora uko bukeye n’uko bwije.

"Ce dont j’ai le plus peur, c’est des gens qui croient que, du jour au lendemain, on peut prendre une société, lui tordre le cou et en faire une autre."

“The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.”

“The hate of men will pass, and dictators die, and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die, liberty will never perish.”

“I have loved justice and hated iniquity: therefore I die in exile."

KOMEZA USOME AMAKURU N'IBITEKEREZO BYA VUBA BYAGUCITSE:

RECOMMENCE

RECOMMENCE

1.Kumenya Amakuru n’amateka atabogamye ndetse n’Ibishobora Kukugiraho Ingaruka ni Uburenganzira Bwawe.

2.Kwisanzura mu Gutanga Ibitekerezo, Kurwanya Ubusumbane, Akarengane n’Ibindi Byose Bikubangamiye ni Uburenganzira Bwawe.