Letter to Rwandan Justice Minister on the "Assessment" of Human Rights
Watch's Work
Human Rights Watch - 4 days ago
JUNE 12, 2014

Dear Minister,
I write in response to the ministry of justice's "assessment" of Human
Rights Watch's work in Rwanda, which was first made known to us
through publication in The New Times on June 2, 2014, and was then
conveyed to me and to our Rwanda researcher on June 3 in a
substantially similar document.
Human Rights Watch is deeply concerned by the ministry's gross
misrepresentations of our work and the disparaging and unfounded
comments against our staff, aired to the Rwandan press. This letter
answers the most serious contentions raised, seeks a withdrawal of
these misinformed accusations, and reiterates our commitment to
working constructively with the Rwandan government.
Accusations of political bias and collaboration with FDLR
Human Rights Watch categorically rejects all accusations of
collaboration with the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda
(Forces démocratiques de libération du Rwanda, FDLR) or of political
bias. Human Rights Watch has never attempted to "sanitise and/or
legitimize" the FDLR, nor have we ever been their "campaign
mouthpiece." The public record of Human Rights Watch's work on the
Great Lakes region shows that these allegations are entirely baseless.
The FDLR includes people who participated in the genocide in Rwanda in
1994 and others who have committed, and continue to commit, horrific
human rights abuses in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. As the
Rwandan government is aware, Human Rights Watch has documented and
denounced the FDLR's abuses in detailed reports and press releases,[1]
repeatedly called for those responsible to be brought to justice, and
testified in court about their crimes.
Human Rights Watch works to uphold the rights of all Rwandans, as
enshrined in Rwandan and international law. Some of the cases we have
researched in Rwanda recently involve people accused of being members
or collaborators of the FDLR. The fact that Human Rights Watch
reported on their unlawful detention or disappearance does not mean
that we are partisan or sympathetic to their views. People do not lose
their basic human rights even if their views are abhorrent or they are
criminals, and Human Rights Watch stands up for the universal human
rights of all people, all over the world.
Far from engaging in what the ministry of justice terms a "deliberate,
sustained and politically motivated propaganda campaign against the
Government of Rwanda," Human Rights Watch has no political motivation
and does not conduct propaganda against the Rwandan government or any
other government. Our role is to research and expose human rights
abuses and seek lawful ways of bringing these abuses to an end,
regardless of the identity of the perpetrators or the victims.
Human Rights Watch has worked on Rwanda for more than 20 years, and we
have documented in great detail the 1994 genocide and the events that
led up to it, particularly in "Leave None to Tell the Story: Genocide
in Rwanda," a 800-page book on the genocide published by Human Rights
Watch and the International Federation of Human Rights in 1999. Human
Rights Watch staff also testified about crimes committed during the
genocide before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.[2]
We are therefore sensitive to the context of events in Rwanda.
However, the rights Human Rights Watch promotes are universal. We have
a responsibility to apply the same rigorous methodology and
objectivity in all the countries where we work in order to ensure
fairness, balance, and consistency.
We believe that the ministry of justice's ill-informed allegations
regarding Human Rights Watch's support of the FDLR and political bias
are unfounded and derogatory. We therefore ask the ministry to
publicly retract them.
Disparaging allegations against Human Rights Watch staff
For the same reason, we object to the ministry's disparaging,
personalized comments about Human Rights Watch's current and former
researchers and ask you to retract these too. Our researchers working
in and on Rwanda uphold the organization's high standards and
methodology. We stand by their work and their personal integrity,
which the ministry's comments have impugned. Attempts to personalize
disagreements between Human Rights Watch and the Rwandan government in
this way will not deter Human Rights Watch from pursuing its work.
Inaccurate information
We wish to draw your attention to some inaccuracies and factual points
in the ministry's comments, in the spirit of our Memorandum of
Understanding.
With regard to the individual cases of disappearances, unlawful
detentions, and other human rights abuses, we stand by our findings
and are prepared to discuss with you personally any questions you may
have.
The ministry's "assessment" misrepresents some of our statements on
the case of Joel Mutabazi. Human Rights Watch did not assert that
Mutabazi was tortured and forced to confess to crimes following his
forcible return from Uganda in October 2013. The only references to
torture in Human Rights Watch publications on this case relate to the
period of Mutabazi's detention in military custody in Rwanda in 2010.
However, we expressed concern about his well-being in November 2013,
given the police's refusal at that stage to disclose his whereabouts.
We maintain that Mutabazi's abduction and forcible return from Uganda
to Rwanda was illegal and constituted a serious human rights
violation; indeed, Ugandan authorities confirmed that the abduction
and forcible return had not followed established legal procedures.
With respect to the ministry's allegation that FDLR members were
instructed to "immediately inform HRW should they be suspected and/or
arrested" and that an FDLR commander supplied the email address of a
Human Rights Watch staff member, we have no knowledge or independent
verification of this. However, it is not uncommon for groups of all
kinds – including some like the FDLR who have been responsible for
numerous crimes – to have contact details of international
organizations, and it is easy for anyone to obtain these. The fact
that some FDLR members might have had a Human Rights Watch email
address or asked their members to contact Human Rights Watch does not
demonstrate support from Human Rights Watch to the FDLR any more than
if FDLR members were to have contact information of government
officials or of a humanitarian organization, for example.
Finally, with respect to the allegation that our researcher was
"assisted and facilitated by one Bahame Innocent" when investigating
events in Rubavu, none of our staff has any record of meeting anyone
by that name. We would appreciate it if you could inform us who this
individual is and why his name is associated with us.
Human Rights Watch's observance of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU).
As explained in recent correspondence and meetings with your ministry,
we believe we have upheld our commitments in the MoU and have engaged
in a dialogue with your ministry in good faith. Indeed, over many
years, successive Human Rights Watch researchers in Rwanda have always
sought out dialogue with the ministry of justice and other government
officials. As the ministry has acknowledged, our researcher presented
information to you on a number of cases, both in writing and in
person, and sought your response before the publication of Human
Rights Watch documents – including, most recently, on the
disappearances described in our press release of May 16. We referred
to your and other officials' responses explicitly in that press
release.
Press releases, by their nature, are produced and published quickly,
because they are usually responses to urgent situations, and it is
therefore inappropriate to delay them for long periods while we wait
for a response. Disappearances are particularly urgent as people's
lives and safety may be at risk.
The overall aim of our MoU is "to work jointly and severally to
achieve broad protection of human rights in Rwanda." Despite our
recent disagreements, we still abide by the spirit of this agreement
and are sincerely committed to working alongside the ministry of
justice to protect and promote human rights in Rwanda.
We therefore intend to maintain an open dialogue. For our part, we
remain committed to sharing information and discussing human rights
concerns with you and other government officials in Rwanda.
Yours sincerely,
Daniel Bekele
Executive Director, Africa Division
[1] See, for example, Human Rights Watch report "'You Will be
Punished': Attacks on Civilians in Eastern Congo",
http://www.hrw.org/reports/2009/12/13/you-will-be-punished, and our
latest report of June 10, 2014, "Democratic Republic of Congo: Ending
Impunity for Sexual Violence", http://www.hrw.org/node/126204.
[2] To mark the 20th anniversary of the Rwandan genocide, Human Rights
Watch published a briefing paper, "Justice After Genocide: 20 Years
On", http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/03/28/rwanda-justice-after-genocide-20-years.
For other Human Rights Watch publications relating to the Rwandan
genocide, please see https://www.hrw.org/node/124219.
http://www.google.ca/gwt/x?gl=CA&wsc=yh&source=s&u=http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/06/12/letter-rwandan-justice-minister-assessment-human-rights-watchs-work&hl=en-CA&ei=QlifU8KjOI6ssgf_sICQDg
--
SIBOMANA Jean Bosco
Google+: https://plus.google.com/110493390983174363421/posts
YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9B4024D0AE764F3D
http://www.youtube.com/user/sibomanaxyz999
***Online Time:15H30-20H30, heure de Montréal.***Fuseau horaire domestique:
heure normale de la côte Est des Etats-Unis et Canada (GMT-05:00)***
Posted by: Jean Bosco Sibomana <sibomanaxyz999@gmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (1) |
.To post a message: RwandaLibre@yahoogroups.com; .To join: RwandaLibre-subscribe@yahoogroups.com; .To unsubscribe from this group,send an email to:
RwandaLibre-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
_____________________________________________________
More news: http://www.amakurunamateka.com ; http://www.ikangurambaga.com ; http://rwandalibre.blogspot.co.uk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-SVP, considérer environnement avant toute impression de cet e-mail ou les pièces jointes.
======
-Please consider the environment before printing this email or any attachments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.